Comments

Letters to the Jekyll Island Authority’s

Board of Directors

The 200+ pages that follow shed some light on how Jekyll’s visitors feel about the island and its redevelopment. We’ve shared this information with JIA’s Board of Directors and the members of the Jekyll Oversight Committee so that the views of the park’s visitors can be sampled and taken into full account by those charged with responsibility of administering to the needs of JI State Park.

There are four sections within this body of information: letters sent directly to the JIA’s Board of Directors; a selection of comments provided by survey respondents from Georgia (beginning on page 12); public opinion on the Jekyll affordability issue (beginning on page 145); and a selection of comments offered by survey respondents from beyond Georgia (beginning on page 173).

I am writing regarding the RFP that has been issued for the "redevelopment" of Jekyll Island. My understanding of the plan is that it fails to take into account the fact that "affordability" is a legally-mandated consideration for anything to do with Jekyll.

I have been going to Jekyll Island almost every summer since the 1980s. Jekyll is one of the few beaches around that is still affordable for people of modest means and/or families with children. The undisturbed beaches and the natural beauty of the area are a blessing for those of us who just want a place to relax and avoid the development that has swallowed up so many other beach towns along the Atlantic coast. Most Georgians (and most Americans, for that matter) cannot afford hotel rooms at $200-250 per night, or million dollar condominiums.

The idea of a town square from the convention center to Blackbeard's is a bad one. It would be a tragedy to see Jekyll crowded with "fashionable" stores, trendy restaurants and overpriced hotels. It is not a crime against humanity to preserve Jekyll in its present state, and to provide an affordable vacation retreat for those of us who are not millionaires, or do not wish to go into debt to take a summer vacation. The well-to-do have many choices available to them if they want an upscale vacation. The rest of us have Jekyll Island, one of the few places remaining that is still affordable. Leave it alone!

Mary Sullivan, Atlanta, GA

As long time visitors to Jekyll Island, we are greatly disturbed by what is happening at this time! In no way are the average people being considered when I read about the proposed happenings.

We regularly stayed at the Buccaneer Resort and were very delighted to be able to afford the old Georgia feeling and care that we received from both staff and surroundings. We were planning on returning next year and went to make a reservation when we were informed it was being torn down for a new resort. I can expect more homogenization of the property given what Trammell Crow has done elsewhere. Uniqueness is not part of the bottom line anymore.

We discovered Jekyll years ago because my husband, as a senior officer, was instrumental in building a manufacturing facility in Georgia for his company - headquartered in Michigan. I still have the souvenir of the red Georgia soil encased in plastic that he was given at the opening of the plant. We got to see Georgia and meet many people because of that work. As a result, we have come to feel that Georgia represents a great more genuine Southern hospitality than some other places.

In addition, our son went to school there and we visited him as well. Georgia has so many different kinds of things to offer. We loved exploring after our visits with our son.

We are very disappointed in the bottom-line greed that has pervaded the actions surrounding Jekyll. We have seen this kind of behavior and decision making elsewhere and have grieved over the lack of vision and destruction of special places just like Jekyll. I believe it has long been a true jewel - kept bright and shining while St. Simons has become over run with people, buildings and too many touristy shops. Why have Jekyll become another place that is just like all the rest in the Southeast? There is plenty of open land for development and to sell out to the developers who only care about their own incomes and profits is purely stupid and shortsighted!

In conclusion, please reconsider what is about to happen. In taking away the ambiance that Jekyll currently has, you destroy something that can never be regained. The breathtaking beauty and the peace of this natural resource are priceless. You hold the future of it in your hands and need to see what that future will turn into - a nightmare! The infrastructure cannot possible support what has been presented without a serious problem or problems resulting. More people mean more problems - big ones usually.

Thank you very much for taking the time to read this. I feel very strongly about Jekyll as you can tell. I do love it deeply and treasure the memories of the times spent there. I hope to spend many more winters there, but will not be able to if your developers go ahead with their plans as stated. PLEASE take care.

Julie Simmons

Regarding the recent e-mail on Jekyll affordability, I think some hotels with rooms starting at $250, or higher, is a great and necessary way to bring the island managed development. It is the only way to have better and more restaurants, shopping and profitable development. If the mid-range hotels come which I think $250 is, then at some point the less expensive level motel will also build. All of the same price range level does not serve all of the citizens of Georgia in any way.

I enjoy Jekyll Island tremendously and hope the undeveloped part of the island stays as it is. I don't believe affordable means the same to all and compared to most beach front hotel costs, $225 to $250 will be a rate welcomed by many.

Mary Jane Coleman, St. Simon’s, GA

I am a fourth generation Georgian, and I have been going to Jekyll Island yearly or more often since 1975. Before that, I went to St. Simons and Jekyll with my parents and my grandmother, my aunt and uncle and cousins. My grandchildren are the fourth generation in our family to enjoy Jekyll Island.

Even when my husband was in graduate school at UGA, we could afford to vacation at Jekyll Island with our daughter and my parents, who were in declining health and modest circumstances.

I understand that the RFP that has been issued for the "redevelopment" of Jekyll Island does not even consider the legally mandated affordability issue for the "average" Georgian.

On my latest visit there June 9-16, I observed cars from counties all over Georgia --- people with their children, enjoying the natural beauty, the walking and biking trails, the lovely beach. This is as it should be.

The average Georgian can not afford million dollar condos or $200 a night hotel rooms. They don't want to be squeezed out by rising costs and building on the beaches. A so-called "town square" from the convention center to Blackbeard's is not desirable. We do not need trendy boutiques, Hard Rock Cafes or Tommy Bahamas. We need affordable accommodations. Refurbishing the existing hotels is a good idea, as long as they do not become beyond the reach of Georgians of average income.

There are already expensive islands for those who can afford and who desire them. There is only one Jekyll Island.

Please reply and let me know what steps you are taking to fulfill the will of the legislature that established the parameters for Jekyll Island and for observing the spirit of the law.

Theresa Miller Matt, Athens, GA

Jekyll remains one of Georgia's treasures as a habitat for nesting sea turtles and migrating birds as well as for its unique salt marshes, sand dunes, and unrestricted beaches. As a resort, it is one of the few remaining coastal havens accessible to those of us who are not affluent.

To allow the construction of big-ticket homes and high-rise condominiums would benefit no one but a few avaricious developers and a handful of their wealthy clients, who often feel entitled to gates, security guards, and exclusive rights to Georgia's natural beauty. Most importantly, such development would put excessive pressure on the island's wildlife, roads, beaches, and infrastructure and discourage visitation by the common Georgians for whom the island was intended when it became a state park.

When considering the redevelopment of Jekyll, please keep the protection of our natural resources in mind as well as the affordability of accommodations for ordinary Georgians, who will be priced out of a beach vacation on the island if developers are allowed to proceed with their plans for the south end of the island.

Does the world really need another St. Simons Island or Hilton Head where the beach and marsh are no longer visible to the public, where traffic is in a constant snarl, and where once vibrant natural habitats for wildlife have disappeared?

Brenda Deily Constan

Please do consider the factor of affordability in room rates. There is no way in the world I would ever come to Jekyll Island and pay $250 a night for a room. I'd drive an extra hour or so and just make a one day visit before I'd pay that much. I also think you should consider the fact that the majority of Georgians aren't making stratospheric sums of money and can't afford to spend that much for a hotel room. I personally try not to spend more than $60 to $80 on a hotel room and when I do I make sure I have a microwave and refrigerator. If all the hotel options are way, way out of my price range, I wouldn’t even consider coming at all. If it is only slightly out of my price range I can go, hmm, and see what I can juggle (like cutting the trip shorter).

[Regarding the statement]"There are other stakeholders in Jekyll Island besides those of average income whose needs must be taken into account." Actually, if you look at the population of Georgia there are more "average" income citizens than there are citizens who make large sums of money. And if I remember rightly, Jekyll Island is owned BY the citizens of Georgia, neither the Development Authority nor the hotels. Since there are more average income citizens (stakeholders) in Georgia than above average, shouldn't the redevelopment of Jekyll Island have a large proportion of rooms that cater to them? There is a much more limited number of above average incomes out there and if the majority of what is built caters to them and nothing is built/redeveloped for us average joe/joettes is that fair?

Are you trying to create an elitist environment? And aren't you also creating a potential problem when you find you've got too many rooms built for the high end and not enough high end customers booking nights and you have low occupancy rates which leads to low cash flow?

If you wanted to make 25% to 30% be high end that would make sense. But to make it all be high end.... nope.

Sincerely, an average Joe(ette) citizen of Georgia i.e. stakeholder

Vicki Williams, Marietta, GA

"Georgia's Jewel" needs your help in protecting and maintaining the island as a valuable environmental resource that has provided memories for visitors, students, and other "plain" Georgians who were to be its principal beneficiaries when the state purchased the property in 1947. The Jekyll Island Authority shouldn't be in the business of doling out welfare to wealthy developers at the tune of $10 million. The proposed room rate

of $250 is not affordable to the average Georgian. An email has been sent to the Governor requesting he help preserve Jekyll's affordability.

Professor Brillhart taught a coastal Biology Course for twenty years at Emory University doing the lab portion for three weeks each year during the summer on the Georgia coast. He stressed to the students as they visited Jekyll that it is one of the few barrier islands accessible by land that had been preserved for Georgians. Jekyll has a large natural area of preserved dune structure, marsh, a beach with many shells washing onto the beach, with a wonderful bird sanctuary that. Jekyll in addition to its ecological value has great historical interest. It's most important that the historical and ecological features remain for the coming generations and not be destroyed or impacted by development for the rich. Developments should have a controlled, limited impact on the ecology and history of this wonderful treasure.

Georgia Law prohibits the development of 65% which is to benefit all Georgians not just those who could afford $250 night. Board Member Ed Boshears "I just don't think that the rent abatement they proposed to give these people is justified. It doesn't make any sense to me." We agree with him.

Connie and Bill Brillhart, St. Simons Island, GA 31522

I am writing to let you know my feelings on the new developments on Jekyll Island. While I am not from Georgia, I have vacationed on the Island since 1975. I enjoy the island as it is. I could never afford to stay on St. Simons or Sea Island, but I can afford to stay on Jekyll. I feel that any attempts to develop Jekyll Island to be more in the line with the other two islands which are just a short distance away would benefit the same people who already are benefiting from what is offered on the other two islands. I visited St. Simons Island this year and it was a traffic nightmare. I returned to Jekyll and find peace and solitude. Jekyll is where the person of average income can vacation. If the wealthy want to vacation there I am sure that they could stay at the Millionaire's club or Crane cottage. That is if they required lodging that only they can afford.

It is also my opinion that since St. Simons and Sea Island are running out of room for development this new plan is being pushed through to benefit the wealthy, bankers, and developers. How many members of the JIA board are from Jekyll? How many are from St. Simons? How many are from Brunswick? How many make under $50,000 a year? I think when you answer these questions you will see what I am talking about, and get the point I am trying to make. It is a land grab, because the other land is already taken. Please continue to make Jekyll Island a vacation paradise that all can afford. If some people because of there financial situation need fancier "digs" let them go elsewhere. If you over develop the island and make part of it only available to the very wealthy, then eventually that is all that there will be on Jekyll. It will become a millionaires club again: and the people who can afford to vacation there now may be able to get jobs waiting tables, or as cleaning ladies, or hotel clerks. Just like they did when it was a private club.

I recently spent a weekend getaway with two children at Georgia's best beachfront state park, Jekyll Island. We had a wonderful time along with other families of average means enjoying the beach and the natural beauty of this state park. We stayed at a comfortable but modest and affordable hotel across the street from the beach. At $125 a night, this hotel was in reach of average middle class Georgia families, as the island's charter calls for.

I was dismayed to learn of the plans that are being entertained to "revitalize" Jekyll Island by replacing the present modest and affordable hotels that cater to average citizens with luxury hotels and condominiums that only wealthy persons will be able to afford to visit. Adding insult to injury is the proposal to relocate "budget" hotels inland so that only the wealthy will have direct access to the beach. Jekyll Island is a state park

that belongs to all the people of this state, not a private playground for the rich like Sea Island and Hilton Head. The wealthy have plenty of fancy places to go to if they find the current motor lodges too modest for their taste.

In keeping with the island's status as a state park, instead of replacing the existing convention center with an expanded facility together with additional shops, boutiques, condominiums, and whatnot, why not tear it down and build a public beachfront park with picnic tables and walk-in tent camping. The current northern campground could continue to be used primarily by persons using recreational vehicles, while the new southern campground could offer a more natural alternative to campers in tents who don't want to listen to the noise of RV motors running all night long. Perhaps a park headquarters and ranger station with a wildlife exhibit could be installed as well as is the case at other state parks. Or a small amphitheater for nighttime ranger presentations about the island's history and natural life. This would promote ecotourism and encourage conservation rather than allowing Jekyll Island to be developed into another St. Simon's Island, with overdevelopment spoiling the natural beauty.

In short, please keep Jekyll Island affordable and remember that it is a state park, not a plum to be handed over to wealthy developers eager to pave over nature for their own profit.

Jeffrey Sokolow, Atlanta, GA

Last week I spent a great, relaxing week at Jekyll Island with my mother and her sister. I've been coming to Jekyll since the early 70s when I was a preteen. I've been to other beaches: Panama City, Destin, but I always come back to Jekyll. Why? Because it is a BEACH!! It is the ocean lapping up against your ankles. It is the sound of the waves and tide coming in through your motel room window late at night. It is darkness and looking for sea turtles. It is peaceful, calm, and quiet. When sitting on the beach at Jekyll it is very easy to imagine what the beach looked like before Oglethorpe, before the Spanish explorers, when it was just the Native Americans and the animals and God.

I agree that the motels need to be refurbished and renovated. I would even go so far as to say that the little shopping area needs a fresh coat of paint or facade but other than that I would say LEAVE IT ALONE!! It was originally intended as a STATE PARK FOR THE CITIZENS OF GEORGIA. Well, this citizen doesn't need shopping malls, movie theaters when she goes to the beach; just some good seafood at Zachary's or Blackbeard’s, a round of putt-putt and a picnic on the clean, calm peaceful beaches of my state park!!

That's what I consider Jekyll Island MY BEACH...I don't live there but I'm a native of this great state and I say leave it alone

Deborah Autry, Calhoun, GA

When I was much younger, Jekyll was one of the few places that I could take my family for a short vacation because it was affordable. I still love going to Jekyll even though I could afford more expensive places. I realize that greed, profit, and a total lack of appreciation of beauty will usually win. I am making a request, however, to keep Jekyll a place for all people. We have enough exclusivity as it is.

John Bishop

I visit Jekyll Island at least three times a year and have for years. I can

not continue to do that if the new development that is proposed goes through. I can't stay if the price goes to $140 per night or higher. I don't know many people who can. Jekyll has been our vacation spot. I suppose I could take my business to South Carolina if Hunter Island beach is still affordable.

I don't care for the Florida beaches as they are overpriced and "fakey."

That is how I see the development at places like San Marco Island and Sea

Island. They are ugly monuments to the nouveau riche; we called this style of

development as nouveau riche tacky. Worse, they will never be returned to

their normal natural beautiful state.

I implore you to reconsider your plans for Jekyll development to include

those of us who truly love this island.

Janie Hopwood, GA

Hello, my name is Ashley Chasteen, and I am a recent graduate of UGA. My family has been visiting Jekyll for over forty-five years. Besides its tranquility, natural beauty, and wonderful seafood, one of the main reasons we spend our time there is its affordability of its hotels and attractions. The prices that the Trammel Crow Company plans to tag onto its refurbished Buccaneer Resort hotel rooms (where my family has stayed for years) would push families like mine out of our favorite spot. Originally, the island was intended to be an affordable destination for people of "ordinary means;" charging over $200 a night for a hotel room clashes with the island's affordability mandate originally set forth in Jekyll's founding legislation. Has the JIA even mentioned this affordability mandate to the Trammel Crow Co.?

I must ask you, why push the loyal Jekyll-goers out of their oceanside accommodations when refurbishing the already affordable hotels will accomplish the feat of bringing in money for the island. Those belonging to a more affluent class already have their rich destinations - please help us and countless other families preserve our little - affordable - slice of heaven.

Ashley Chasteen, Marietta, GA

I am writing to you as a concerned citizen regarding the future of Jekyll Island. It appears we are at a crossroads for what Jekyll Island is today and what it can or should be in the future. There is no question a solution must evolve which provides for the long term economic needs of Jekyll. In some shape form or fashion, Jekyll Island must generate sufficient funds to support the scale and scope of amenities on the island. Some sort of economic self sufficiency must be realized. What is most disturbing to me is the potential for destruction of Jekyll Island's primary redeeming value, natural beauty, while people take a one sided approach to solving Jekyll's financial predicaments. I continue to read and hear reports the state wants to develop the few remaining natural parcels with high end luxury features commonly found on Amelia, Fripp, Skidaway, St. Simons, with developments in the hundreds of millions of dollars targeted to the top 10% of wage earners. It sounds like the developers and consultants have convinced everyone Jekyll Island can only survive if we destroy part of it to save all that remains to create another seaside playground for the well to do. Is the true purpose of JIA to orchestrate and develop another exclusive playground for the top 10% income families? Or is the purpose of JIA to protect the natural beauty and provide for future generations? New development should not be allowed until existing developments are self sustaining. Once they are self sustaining, new development is not required! If that requires demolition and rebuild on existing areas, so be it.Let me make myself very clear. Jekyll Island belongs to all Georgians. Not the wealthy. Not the top 10%, 20% or 70%. Jekyll Island belongs to ALL Georgians. Any development which limits accessibility and affordability of Jekyll Island to average citizens (taxpayers) of Georgia is morally, ethically, and legally wrong. Just so you know, I am in the top 5% of taxpayers, I just try to keep things in perspective about how fortunate I am and how others deserve access to public amenities. The state park system cannot create economic exclusivity on Jekyll. If 50% of citizens earn less than $50,000, then 50% of the features offered on the island must be affordable to those $50,000 citizens. Logically, then 10% of features and amenities can carry a richer price tag for those earning in the top 10% wage brackets. It is my understanding the charter which created the JIA is very specific in regards to providing affordable features to "average" citizens.Since it is clear an exclusive high end development cannot be the primary solution, what can help create the revenue streams needed to support and protect Jekyll Island for generations to come? Have you looked at eco-tourism as a foundation for economic growth? Have you looked at partnering with Bernie Marcus and Georgia Aquarium to create learning and education programs for youth and families? Are you making the best use of the 4H facility, or have you neglected it the same as Rock Eagle? Are the athletic fields used for training camps, tournaments, etc on a regular basis with high schools, colleges, etc? Have you really put forth the mental energy needed to develop creative solutions, or have you just relied on the special interest groups to guide you to the answer that will enrich them at taxpayers’ expense? Can you even tell me what the current break even point is for Jekyll? How many more visitors and what revenue is needed to move Jekyll closer to a breakeven point for maintaining the island's current state supported amenities? I am passionate about this topic because it is my island, my family's island, and belongs to my family's future generations as well. I will not stand by and allow special interest groups to take over my island and limit my accessibility based on economics. Instead of taking the easy way out, work harder and develop a creative solution which meets the needs of the island plus the majority of Georgia's citizens at the same time consistent with JIA charter. That is your job isn't it? Mike Powers, Hiram, Georgia,

In your deliberations regarding changes being considered for the Island, please keep in mind the Georgia Code of Law which has mandated that Jekyll Island be affordable to the average person. Putting in hotels with the prices I have been shown would certainly eliminate many people from coming back to Jekyll Island. Also, I believe having condos build where the Buccaneer Hotel was located would be a mistake. This would inhibit access to the beaches and block the ocean view for others.Please don't let money grabbing land developers come in and ruin this paradise. My family and I have been coming there since the 80's and is always our first preference when we decide where to vacation. Take a look at St. Simon and Hilton Head; developers and money have set them aside for only people of wealth.Please give this great consideration before destroying this paradise for the average people Nancy Hopkins, GA

I love to visit Jekyll because it has been kept in a more natural state. My interest is in the wild life and natural environment, not swank accommodations. Please do not allow greedy developers to over develop this special place.My second concern is keeping hotel rooms affordable on the island. What to me is affordable would be $80.00 to $90.00 a night for two double beds. Thank you for your stewardship of what is a natural treasure belonging to all Georgians. Jo Hamby, Pine Lake, GA

We have been staying at Jekyll for nearly 10 years now, since we first moved to Georgia. We were first attracted by the State Musical Theater of Georgia, where our son spent two summers. We were devastated when the theater lost it's funding, as we enjoyed so many happy evenings there over the years. One of the main reasons we continue to come, is the fact that we can afford to stay for an entire week, usually by renting one of the houses or duplexes available on the island.

We love to visit, and would love to spend additional long weekends on Jekyll. We used to do so, staying at the Holiday Inn. It began to decline, and of course is now gone. If there were attractive, affordable hotels available, we would be able to return every few months. For us, that hotel needs to be $100 per night or less. Something along the lines of a Hampton Inn, Holiday Inn Express, etc. We would want these hotels to be located where the present and recent hotels have been, not tucked into some obscure corner of the island.

We appreciate the fact that Jekyll is a simple, peaceful place to enjoy the ocean. Without the noise and distraction of lots of clubs, theme parks, etc. Surely people looking for that type vacation have more than enough places from which to choose. Please save our island from becoming "just another Hilton Head", or God forbid, Panama City Beach.

We ask that you remember the Georgia code, designating Jekyll as a place for "the plain people of Georgia". The wealthy clientele you are trying to attract is the very thing we "plain people" try to avoid while on vacation. They can go to Sea Island, or St. Simons, or any of a number of other Georgia places. Jekyll Island is a state park. The law was written to keep it that way.

You can be sure that we, along with thousands of other Jekyll Island lovers, will be watching your actions.

Rich and Sharon Selzer, Snellville, GA

My family has been coming to Jekyll Island from Canada annually for more than 15 years for the absolutely unique living experience we enjoy there. The openness to the ocean from almost any point on the island, the long beautiful and quiet beaches, miles of flat and quiet bike paths , the beautiful and welcoming tennis club and features such as the continuing development of the Historic District and most important of all, the feeling of peace and tranquility that is the hallmark of Jekyll Island .

We understand development options are being considered for the Island. We believe the atmosphere of Jekyll is a very delicate one and are concerned that major developments could destroy the very thing that makes Jekyll so very special to so many people.

Coming from Ontario, Canada we have seen devastating effects of major development on what we now realize should have been conserved as treasures. The shores of our beautiful Muskoka lakes are ringed with huge private cottage/condominium estates making it virtually impossible to access or even view the lakes except from a few small public areas. And dining is either hot dogs or expensive high-end cuisine. Similarly the Ontario shores of Lake Ontario are now given over almost completely too expensive homes and high rise condominiums giving the affluent wonderful lake views but prohibiting same for others. And in Toronto, our provincial capital, the city is fighting the uphill battle of trying to “reclaim” its waterfront for its citizens.

You and the Jekyll Island Authority have made Jekyll Island unique! If it is carrying its own weight financially it would be a great shame to change its environment. It is serving a wonderful purpose for so many people of average and less means. Brush it up, sure, but please don't change its nature. There are so many places that cater to the affluent in our world. Please do not spoil this blessed place for the others.

For people who would like higher end facilities, and can afford them, there is, of course, the Jekyll Island Club and its Grand Dining Room. And for more variety there is St Simon's and Sea Island, both within minutes of Jekyll Island. As you well know, they together with Brunswick itself, boast some of the finest high end dining in the South.

We hope that plans for the future of Jekyll Island will benefit from the mistakes made in dealing with other treasures and will simply enhance the features that make the Island so appealing and unique.

Thank you and the Jekyll Island Authority for your past achievements in creating such a marvelous place of peace and enjoyment as Jekyll Island.

Marjorie and Robin Banks, Ontario, Canada

My family and I have vacationed on Jekyll Island since 1995; it is a very unique and special place to us. We have followed the plans for redevelopment of the islands facilities very closely and are concerned about the direction they seem to be taking. Jekyll's mandate as I understand it is to be affordable and accessible to all Georgians and it should remain so. I believe it should also remain affordable for those such as our family who come from outside Georgia to visit Jekyll. I would agree that the islands facilities are in need of some renewal and upgrading, I disagree with relying to heavily on a public/private partnership to achieve this. The State obligation is to the people, the private obligation is solely to profit. A rush to utilize a state resource in this way would inevitably lead to the loss of accessibility of that resource for a large segment of Georgians and visiting out of state tourist alike. Jekyll is currently affordable to everyone; there are accommodations that appeal to all regardless of income. Replacing value and moderately priced lodging with strictly upscale hotels and condominiums only serves to create an air of exclusivity about the place and would effectively price families of moderate incomes out of the market. Closing even a small portion of the island attractions such as the golf course to the public would be a detriment as well. Jekyll was once an exclusive enclave of the wealthy, I fear that implementation of the proposed redevelopment plan would make it that again. We receive the Jekyll Island Beachscape newsletter each month. Every issue touts Jekyll as a family vacation destination; a place to enjoy nature, family and to get away for the everyday hustle and bustle. We hope that it remains such a place, one that from our experience is like no other. Please keep it that way.

Paul, Ginger and Jordan Patterson, Gurley, Alabama

I have been going to Jekyll Island for twenty five years. I go with twenty five or thirty friends from all over the eastern part of the U.S. We can do this because it is affordable. We come here to play golf and enjoy the ocean. We are blue collar workers who have families and work hard for our money. Because Jekyll Island is affordable we can save enough to make this trip each year. If a two bed room rate was more than $150.00 per night it would be unaffordable to my friends and I. People with lots of money have lots of places to go. Please leave this wonderful place for the average working families of Georgia and the other states who go there. Thank you, James Archibald, Aiken, SC

We urge you to take into consideration affordability when making decisions about Jekyll's revitalization in general and hotel redevelopment in particular. Take a look at the median income of the residents of Georgia and let that be your guide.

Keep in mind that Jekyll's affordability is part of the Georgia Code of Laws

and as such should figure significantly in your deliberations.

Margaret and William Medeiros, Nantucket, MA

My family and I have been coming to Jekyll Island for 20 years and we were just there last week. I was shocked to hear what is going on. We have all these years praised Jekyll to all we know as affordable and restful. Our haven from gross commerciality and overpricing throughout this country for beach areas. To me a vacation is not a vacation without beach (peaceful beach that is). On Jekyll we can afford to rent a house and walk across the street to the beach. We can afford to invite family and friends and not ask them to contribute (either because they can't afford it or because it is repayment for like treatment at other locations). We fix our own meals which helps with affordability. The golf is also affordable. We played three times on Jekyll where we wouldn't be able to afford to play even once over on St Simons. When we first started coming to Jekyll Island we started out renting a house. We have been renting the same house each time. When we first came it was $300 and is now a little over $1000 but still affordable. If hotel room rates go to $250 I would hate to think what houses will go to!!!!!! One thing is for sure is that a family tradition will no longer be possible. My first grandchild will be born this year, will I be able to give my grandchild the same memories his mother has? Don't allow Jekyll to become another oasis for only the rich. How many hearts will you break?

Sue Gay, Louisville, KY

Georgians Speak on Jekyll’s Redevelopment

Georgia has an opportunity to preserve a unique natural resource or to plunder it and fill the pockets of developers and merchants. I hope we will have the wisdom to serve as a model of conservation and preservation rather than an emblem of greed. To sell Jekyll Island's unspoiled natural beauty to commercial interests determined to wring dollars out of every inch of the island would be to declare before the world that we are soul-less, avaricious drones. Don't sell out the wildlife; don't sell out the people of Georgia.

Lindsie Tucker, Marietta, GA 30062

I feel there needs to be some upgrading of the facilities , more shops and restaurants etc .However, I don't want anything to hinder the good job they have done replacing the dunes .I remember when the beach area was one big parking lot , and they have improved on that tremendously .We have spent the night at The Club Hotel , but we saved for a special occasion to do that -and its rates shoud be the highest on the island. NO RITZ CARLTON , NO Mercer Reynolds - Reynolds Plantation - PLEASE.

Maurice & Martha Mixson,

Jekyll Island should remain a place for the citizens of Georgia (as well as other visitors) to visit without the commercialism that is seen at other places. I enjoy the natural atmosphere where we can enjoy the beaches and safe bike rides. Jekyll Island has changed very little in the over 30 years I have been coming. The relaxing atmosphere is what keeps bringing me back. Don't let the developers ruin the Island! Once it is gone, it will be gone forever

David Powell, Acworth, GA

We are losing so many of Georgia's treasures to development, I don't want to see Jekyll lost forever to the "plain Georgians," too. The almighty dollar speaks louder than the historical significance or the fragile beauty of our great state to some people. Power run amuck, like greed, is an ugly thing. I do hope Jekyll can be secured for all time for true "plain Georgians."

Karen LeCroy, Acworth, GA

Jekyll Island is Georgia's treasure for the average citizen - the less development the better.

Roy & Carole Williams, Darien GA

I spent my honeymoon at the San Sousci at the Jekyll Island Club and visited there annually until my husband passed in 2001. Every year we would go ahead and reserve "our room". I have many happy memories of the visits and tours of the island. Since my first knowledge of Jekyll Island, my sister and her husband have fallen in love with it too. They used to go to Mexico annually but Jekyll has replaced that trip. In fact they are on Jekyll this weekend. Keep it as it is. I live on Tybee Island and the developers have played havoc with this island. Remember....they are only lying when their lips are moving!! Protect that lovely island!!

Charlene B Barrett, Tybee Island, Ga. 31328

My spouse and I come to Jekyll Island, because we want to forego the costs and "airs" of St. Simons. We were married in Faith Chapel and rented Cherokee for the weekend. Additionally, we love the nature offerings of Jekyll. My parents brought us to Jekyll as children to feed the squirrels. I do not want it to be unaffordable for families like we were, when I was a kid.

Lorelei Odom Shipp, Carrollton, GA 30116

As a native of Glynn County, Granddaughter of an early resident (1935) of Glynn Haven, I have seen the natural beauty of St. Simons overwhelmed by rampant development. My husband refuses to set foot on St. Simons. Now the developers have set their sights on Jekyll, probably the last frontier of coastal beauty. We are all recharged and released of everyday stress by visiting a quiet, peaceful, natural setting. We do not need another place for non-stop doing. Let those who wish to pursue expensive hobbies and fabulous meals go to Miami Beach, Hilton Head, Mytle Beach with their overcrowded roads. A majority of average Georgians need an affordable place for family reunions, 4-H camps, school outings. We also need a place for educators to teach about the importance of our coastal eco-system. In a few years all the condos will need new roofs, new appliances, etc. and the absentee owners will not be willing to invest the time or money on the upkeep. Any one who was in Atlanta during the great condo bust can attest to what happens. My idea of Heaven is a walk on the beach or along a sandy trail in a maritime forest followed by perfectly fried local shrimp, hush puppies, coleslaw, and a big glass of ice cold tea. then off to watch the stars until bedtime. Hopefully, these simple pursuits will still be possible on Jekyll for at least the rest of my children's lifetimes.

Barbara Diemmer, Monroe, Georgia

There is no question that the deteriorating hotels and convention center on Jekyll need help, and I do not believe the State of Georgia is up to doing the job in the most efficient and effective manner.

I do not have a problem with redevelopment on the island as long as: 1. It stays at 35% and only in current developed areas; 2. There is a height restriction of no more than 3 stories (2 is preferable on the beach front); 3. Public beach access and facilities are maintained in the plan; 4. Protection of the ecosystems on the island during and after construction is closely monitored; 5. The number of hotel rooms or condos is not increased substantially; 6. The density stays low (ie mandatory green space surrounding any proposed redevelopment or development with preservation of current vegetation as well as additional plantings with mandatory eco-friendly construction practices); 7. The number of affordable rooms on beach-front properties are, at a minimum, equal to, but preferably greater than, the number of upscale rooms.

Laurie Middleton, Marietta, GA

When will the voice of the people be hear as opposed to that of people we elect? More and more of Georgia is being given away to private groups after the taxpayers of Georgia paid for that same item in the beginning (Stone Mountain Park). We are simply being told that these things are money losers while big busy continues to profit from the sweat of the honest people who have worked hard to pay taxes and tolls for items that are given away once a person is elected to office. I pray that the Island remains a place that is still affordable in the near future or we all will regret the profit motive in the very near future.

Davis Cooper, Waycross, Georgia

Jekyll needs to be affordable to the masses. It needs to be a place for education and environmental efforts. The rich & famous have other places, but the average person needs Jekyll to remain available. Students need top quality 4H & educational facilities unblighted by development.

Bette & Charles Baldwin, Tifton, GA

Jekyll is a jewel in that so many islands become exclusive clubs for those who are wealthy. Jekyll has been the everyday person's island. It indeed needs to be protected so that it is not prostituted like its neighbor St. Simons to line the wallets of the developers and become a rich person's playground or relegated only to those with well-heeled pockets like Sea Island. The environmental issues from too much or from uncontrolled development are far too great since a barrier island is naturally moving over time. Artificial methods of maintaining the beaches are costly and infringe on the natural beauty of the beaches. Enhancing the island is one thing, but tearing down places like the Buccaneer to replace with a much higher end hotel ends up limiting who can come and enjoy the island. No private beaches either unless it is to protect the turtles or other animal or plant species living on the island.

Barbara King, Griffin, GA 30224

I WOULD PERFER THAT THE ISLAND REMAIN UNDEVELOPED WITH SMALL/MEDIUM SIZED HOTEL ROOMS BUILT TO REPLACE THE OLDER MOTEL/HOTELS. THE PRICE OF THE ROOMS NEED TO REMAIN AFFORDABLE TO ALL GEORGIANS. IF YOU WANT HIGH PRICED HOTEL ACCOMODATIONS, GO TO ST. SIMONS.

SCOTT SKELTON, CANTON, GA

As for a referendum, I say no because you have to make everyone understand what you are trying to do and you have a lot of people who go vote that do not have a clue as to what they are voting on and the way things are worded on some ballots some might think that if Jekyll was more developed then it might be somewhere they would be more likely to go. If something could be done to get voters to understand what developing would do to Jekyll then maybe put it to a vote.

Jekyll Island is like my second home. I am as comfortable at Jekyll as I am in my own community. I love Jekyll with all of my heart and soul and would be sickened to see it become another Panama City. I loathe that place and have not been in 13 years. I'd rather come to Jekyll in a heart beat. I first visited Jekyll with my parents when I was in 9th grade. We not make a trip to Jekyll every Thanksgiving and I also bring my youth group to Super Wow each summer. Any chance I get in between those trips I am at Jekyll. I just love it. But one of the reasons I come is because you can find all kinds of nature to enjoy where it be a walk on the beach where you find shells, crabs, or other creatures; or the maritime forest where you can see interesting birds and insects. At night, during Thanksgiving, we will get in to at least two different vehicles and look at the deer. Whoever has seen the most deer wins. We don't win anything, just the satisfaction that we saw the most deer. It is always fun. If Jekyll was more developed, these animals would be moved from Jekyll and that is one of the most enjoyed things we do each and every night. We also see other animals when go on our drives. I love Jekyll Island...as it is.

Karmen Mesch, Carrollton, GA 30117

For forty five years, Jekyll Island has been a refuge for me and my family. Year after year, its solitude and undeveloped beauty, especially in the winter months, has restored my eqanimity and peace of mind. I abhor the development along most of the SE coast, yet I understand that many folks find that appealing. I do not. But as long as Jekyll remains much as it it, I have an affordable place to go to meet my needs.

Of course, the aging motels need redevelopment. That needs to be done in a way that maintains the low key and financially accessible ocean front accomodations that are Jekyll's legacy.

Who is really to determine how Jekyll is developed? While it needs to be those who treasure and use Jekyll Island, my fear, which is already coming to pass, is that it will be the developers and promoters whose only interest in Jekyll is profit.

That the JIA is giving my tax money to these developers as "incentive" is a further outrage.

Michele McNichols, Atlanta, GA 30327

Renovate existing facilities and retain the natural areas. If vacationers - wealthy or otherwise - want boutiques, expensive restaurants and "entertainment," they are available at a large number of beach locations. But, there are few ocean-side areas left where average citizens can enjoy relatively unspoiled vistas and a degree of ocean-side serenity.

Jerry & Sylvia Flowers, Macon, GA 31217

We live on the Georgia Coast and have watched the rampant development of all of the barrier islands over the past several years. Currently there are many options for those seeking luxury accommodations and shopping. Jekyll is unique in its affordable access to wildlife and history. We must capitalize on these assets and not create just another St. Simons, Sea Island or Little Cumberland. Let us keep one island for the people, as Jekyll's founders intended.

Cynthia & Michael Robinson, Savannah, GA

The coastline of Georgia and the whole east coast has enough development to satisfy all citizens need for comfortable access. Will we ever realize that once it is developed there is no turning back? It can be maintained for a much longer period of time if is preserved in its natural state. If we run out of space and need to make some modifications to made it easier to get to we will always have that choice available.

Let's leave that choice open for future generations. I'm sure they will be very grateful.

John P. Walsh, Decatur, GA 30030

Jekyll Island has been our vacation choice since our children were 3 and 6. They are now 36 and 40 and there are now 4 grandchildren between 6 years and 10 months. The tradition has been continued with them. We recently spent a week in a 5 bedroom, 3 bath rental, all ten of us. It was a very special week, as have all of them been over the years. In the early years the affordability was very important and still is. We also attended Beach Music for about 12 years.

The history, the ecosystem, the specialness of the Island must be preserved. My children and I have had our chance to love the Island and it is my hope that our grandchildren will be given the same opportunity.

Sandy Lumpkin, Ashburn GA

Jekyll Island is a great place to visit. We love to fish, bike, swim and sail. We miss the public artesian well pool that was there long ago. Jekyll is a great destination because of its natural beauty. Why would anyone want to make it just like every other island destination on the coast? The only motivation is profit. Further development would only server to take it off my list of vacation destinations. Leaving only Cumberland Island and the Canaveral Seashore, FL as 'eco-destinations'. Please do all you can to stop development on Jekyll. I'd be glad to donate to the cause.

Allen Leggett, Lilburn, GA

Jekyll Island is beautiful as it is and development should be limited. If people are looking for 'upscale' developed beach resorts there are way too many to choose from now - we don’t need to turn Jekyll into yet another over priced, over developed island.

Captain Bill Rountree, Tucker GA

I think the Georgia coast & surrounding areas should offer a variety of options. Jekyll is a popular "economical" destination for visitors who choose not to say in other "luxury" destinations such as St Simons and Hilton Head. Jekyll should offer a variety of lodging options to meet the needs of budget minded as well as luxury minded visitors.

A mixed use development plan could provide a broad range of options to a variety of demographic visitors and residents but control, regulation and income sharing should be in the hands of a balanced representation of elected, appointed and hired management professionals that could ensure a balance of income vs preservation agendas.

Dave Crumbley, Lilburn, GA

Save Jekyll Island for ALL the people of Georgia and our visitors as originally intended.

Bert O. Richmond, Athens, GA 30606

I have been vacationing on Jekyll Island since I was 2 years old. I love the island the way it is. It is not crowded and does not have large highways with lots of traffic. It is a place to vacation peacefully and escape the hustle and bustle of daily life. I love riding the bike trails and visiting the current shopping center. I feel safe walking on the beach or sidewalks alone or even at night. My husband, father and brother love the golf course the way it is. We are not a wealthy family, but we can afford to vacation at Jekyll and let the men play golf. I would hate to see the golf course change and become more expensive. If the island becomes a more expensive place to stay or more crowded we might as well go to Tybee or Hilton Head. The ocean water at Hilton Head is a lot less muddy. But we do not like Hilton Head because it is so expensive and crowded. I know that we would not vacation at Jekyll if it were to become so commercial as the other places listed above are. Please do not change the Jekyll Island! When I think of being there I think of such happy times and of a great little island. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help the island stay un-commercialized and remain state owned and controlled.

Kasey Gonya, Sylvania GA 30467

I grew up in Jekyll. It has changed slightly over the years, but it still feels like Jekyll every time I visit. If it's over developed it would completely change the feeling I get when I visit. I love the little restaurants and beaches, drift wood beach is my favorite! If there is going to be any development it should something so small it would be hard to notice. Unless it's an add on to the historical buildings that are there now. I can only think of one place that I love to visit the most and that is Jekyll Island! If it changed too much, I probably wouldn’t visit anymore. I want to bring my kids there and tell them all the adventures I have been through as a child to an adult. If there is a drastic change and then another one comes a long, then, I believe the essence of this island will disappear and it will be just some old resort park thing that nobody cares about anymore!

From the Heart, Hillary Johnson, Lawrenceville GA 30045

I don't stay at hotels now because the current rates of $100 + seem completely out of proportion for the value returned. I usually just want to sleep so that I can enjoy the outdoors later. Thus, I camp.

Myra Hundley, Putney, GA 31782

GA has few accessible beaches. Jekyll has already been severely degraded by development. The pressure for development is purely $$$. Stop development on the island. Put it on the mainland.

Phil Mengel, Carrollton, GA 30116

I have been going to Jekyll since childhood. Not much has changed, and that is so

phenomenal in today’s ever changing society. I was just there for 2 days yesterday.

So uniquely quiet and peaceful. Lots of families there that I am sure could not

go to many places for such affordability and amenities. It would be a shame to take this away from the middle class. Aren't we the people who are the backbone of this country? I hate to see this special place on the coast taken away from the ordinary public to be handed over once again to the wealthy.

Delores Coy, Savannah, GA

I am more concerned about development's impact on the environment rather than the affordability for all to visit. Development should be strictly limited as it creates isolation within populations of animals. If only patches of land are left for the animals, then they cannot vary the gene pool, which will result in inbreeding and/or extinction of a species. It takes 30 years for a sea turtle to mature. If we destroy their nesting ground or add lights near the beach areas, we will certainly be dooming Loggerhead Sea Turtles to extinction. Please consider emphasizing more on the environment rather than expensive development. It will pay off because an increase in development increases pollution. If you aim to protect the environment, you restrict the amount of development possible because you restrict the amount of pollution allowed.

Jennifer Yates, Powder Springs, GA

The fact that there is a limit on the development of the land, the commitment to nature and natural habitat experiences, and the quiet and comfort of Jekyll Island is what draws us there time and again. We need to preserve this island and, for once, say that development is NOT progress. Further commercialization and development on Jekyll Island will detract from the beauty and the intrigue of the island.

Julie Strickland, Portal, GA

JEKYLL ISLAND IS A LOVELY PLACE THAT DOES NOT HAVE A LOT OF TRAFFIC AND CRAZINESS. I LOVE THE QUIET AND PEACEFULNESS OF THE ISLAND. IT HAS ALL ANYONE NEEDS. IF THEY ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE WAY IT IS OR DON'T LIKE IT THEN THEY SHOULD JUST GO SOMEWHERE ELSE. IT IS LOCAL PLACE THAT MY FAMILY CAN GO TO ENJOY THE BEACH. IF THEY DEVELOP TOO MUCH OF THE BEACHFRONT AREA THERE WILL NOT EVEN BE ROOM FOR THE PUBLIC BEACH AND DUE TO THE TIDE THERE ARE TIMES WHEN PART OF THE BEACH IS COMPLETELY COVERED AND YOU HAVE TO GO FURTHER DOWN AND THAT WON'T BE AVAILABLE IF SOMEONE OWNS IT. I LOVE IT JUST THE WAY IT IS AND I DON'T WANT ANYTHING TO CHANGE!!!

HEATHER SMITH, FITZGERALD GA 31750

As a parent and teacher, I have brought my family and students to Jekyll Island. The most endearing trait of Jekyll is the low key atmosphere. It is wonderful to have a place to find and observe nature. A trip to the beach does not have to include being entertained by purchasing a ticket but to enjoy the sights and sounds on your own schedule. Bird watching, bicycling, strolling the beach or observing an alligator promote what we could loose if we develop without perimeters. Myrtle Beach, Hilton Head, Tybee or St. Simons can attribute to the overdevelopment issues.

Tricia Kerr, Conyers, GA 30013

I am so glad to see a group interested in preserving Jekyll. Let me know if I can help. Last year I wrote and webformed Gov. Perdue, all GA politicians, and the JIA. I am very concerned that Jekyll not be turned into a St. Simon. I did not get any good response and feel helpless in the matter. The whole selling out of Jekyll is not being done in a transparent matter but hidden from the public. The Gov. and the JIA have no accountability to the people of GA but they decide the fate of the island. I think your comment pages expressed this very well.

My last point is if Jekyll is a state park why does it have to be a big money maker. Is nothing in the state done because of preservation and to earn a small profit? Nobody I contacted has answered this question. Feel free to e-mail me with suggestions about how to help.

Robin Revennaugh and family, Kennesaw, GA 30152

The actions taken by the Jekyll Island Authority regarding Trammell Crow are not in the interest of the citizens of Georgia. It is outrageous that this jewel of an island owned by the people of Georgia is being used to enrich the few at taxpayers expense and to the detriment of the environment.

Carol Emmons, Atlanta, GA 30342

Jekyll Island should remain a place that the common person can afford to enjoy. That does not mean no more renovations or changes, but it should not be altered for another place for the rich to come - Sea Island, The Cloister, St. Simons should be enough for the higher economic group.

A new, more modern, convention center is a good idea. It would be nice to see the ocean as you drive onto the island. If the convention center could be built where the parking lot is now on the left of it; create parking on the right side; a nice walking park with ocean view where the current building is located.

The biking trails have been improved and are wonderful. The area near the fishing pier on the north end makes a nice difference. Having the Millionaires' Village updated and enhanced has made a big improvement. But, keeping it affordable for the 'working people' is a goal that I hope does not escape the board because they see $$$$$$$$$.

Becky Crosby, Valdosta, GA 31605

The island has its own peculiar character. I have the resources and could go other places but I find myself coming back to Jekyll because there are fewer numbers and more wide open spaces. The 'way it is' is the main reason I keep coming back. Expansion would have a negative impact on its environment and ecology and damage the peculiar character of the island. Not every land resource has to be developed to the max. Jekyll has remained largely unchanged since I first visited the island. This is a good thing. I prefer to preserve the unique character of Jekyll Island as it is.

Charles Cary Grubbs, Griffin, GA

Thank you for the great work you are doing to maintain Jekyll Island as an affordable location for visitors in the middle income bracket. Please let us know if we can help further.

Joe & Theresa Barefoot, Lula, GA 30554

The last time we were at Jekyll, the room was very rundown. I hope there have been renovations done to the present motels on the island. We love going there, but we did not come this year because of the conditions of this motel. We enjoy staying here because it has a complete kitchen, but the beds were awful and the couch was all sunk in on the sides and high in the middle. We love going to the island because it is so peaceful. Thank you for trying to keep it affordable for people like us. We like the fact that it is so quiet and does not have all of the hustle and bustle of everyday life. Thanks again.

Keith and Patricia Vanderwarker, Byron, Georgia 31008

I would like to come every year. My husband is from Pennsylvania and visited for the first time last year. His comment was "Why didn't you tell me this was so nice". Jekyll is one of the few places a family can enjoy the beach without loud music, parties, and a crowded beach. I love it there. It is beautiful. My family loves it there. We were coming this year but are taking a Disney trip this fall and could not afford both.

We stayed at the Beachview by accident. We had a room booked at the Days Inn and our card reader on the door broke and they didn't have another room for us. The Beachview did and we were glad. We drove into Brunswick to eat a couple of times and didn't mind at all. If you read comments about the hotels/motels there a lot of them are not good. Maybe some new affordable lodging and/or restaurants would be ok. But nothing so major that the ambience of the island would be disturbed. We sat and looked over at St. Simons....didn't even want to go there. We don"t need another St. Simons! If Jekyll is disturbed or drastically changed I'm not sure I would go there. Right now it is the only beach for us!

Mike , Beverly Tost, Demorest,Ga 30535

Please remember that Jekyll Island is a unique place. If the proposed development goes forward, the very things that make Jekyll unique will be lost. This is state land, intended to be preserved for the people of the state. As noted by many others, if vacationers of means desire more upscale accommodations, they are welcome to find those at Hilton Head or other resorts. Why give up Jekyll as well? Aren't there enough upscale places to visit, without depriving working people (I'm a school teacher) of this wonderful place? Please, please, don't sell out to private development.

Theresa Pinilla, Georgia

This is a critical fight for the future of Jekyll and we applaud your efforts to maintain a maximum of access for Georgia citizens and to protect the Island's critical ecological resources.

Rafe and Ilze Henderson, Decatur, GA 30033-3402

SO MUCH OF THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF UNDEVELOPED LANDS IS BEING SCARFFED UP BY WHAT MANY CALL PROGRESS AND DEVELOPMENT.....SO MUCH OF THIS SO CALLED DEVELOPMENT US DONE AT SUCH AN EXPENSE TO THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF OUR LANDS AND WILDLIFE..........LEAVING US WITH PLENTY OF CITY AND STORES AND BUILDINGS AND STUFF.AND FILLING SOME BIG BANK ACCOUNTS SOMEWHERE.......

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE SERENITY THAT MOTHER RATURE PROVIDES US ? WHAT ABOUT THAT SPIRITUAL BANK ACCOUNT THAT FILLS ONES SOUL FROM BEING IN A PLACE OF PRISTINE WONDER AS JEKKYL ISLAND ? WHERE DOES IT GO WHEN MAN DEVELOPS HIS IDEA OF HABITAT??...MANY TIMES NATURE MUST MOVE AWAY....OR IS WITHERED AND DESTROYED FAR INTO THE BACKGROUND..STRESS LEVELS GO UP..POLLUTION IS CREATED..

WHO ARE WE TO CONTINUE TAKING , TAKING , TAKING FOR OUR ENJOYMENT AND PROFITS........MEN BETTER SLOW DOWN ENOUGH TO REALIZE ONCE NATURE IS CHANGED BY HIM MANY TIMES IT'S PRISTINE NATURE IS GONE FOREVER............

WE NEED THESE PLACES OF NATURAL BEAUTY FOR OUR WELL-BEING , INSPIRATION, WONDER AND DISCOVERY....AND FOR AT LEAST THE NEXT 7 GENERATIONS TO COME..

THESE PLACES NEED TO BE AFFORDABLE FOR THE COMMON PERSON TO ENJOY....NOT JUST A TOURIST VACATION DESTINATION FOR THE WELL TO DO AND UPPER CRUSST THEY CATER TO..WITH ALL THERE AMENITIES, AMUSEMENT PARKS, ROADWAYS, OVERCROWDING, POLLUTION.....EXPENSIVE TASTE...WITH LITTLE CARE FOR MUCH BUT THE NEXT THRILL.

PLEASE TAKE YOUR OVERDEVELOPMENT AND OVERCROWDING SOMEWHERE ELSE..........BETTER YET GIVE IT UP ....BECAUSE THESE ARE NOT SOUND DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES.THEY DO NOT TAKE INTO ACCT LIVING IN HARMONY WITH A NATURAL HABITAT AND WHAT CAN BE DONE TO MINIMIZE IMPACT ON FRAGILE ECO-SYSTEMS........THEY ARE DESIGNED TO MOSTLY DO ONE THING..........."MAKE SOME RICH POCKETS VERY FULL AND DEEP"..........THESE PRINCIPLES ARE BASED ON GREED, LUST AND EXPLOITATION OF OUR NATURAL RESOURCES

PERHAPS IF PEOPLE WOULD SLOW DOWN AND LOOK AT WHAT WE HAVE IN THESE NATURAL TREASURES OF PLACES SUCH AS JEKYLL........ THEY'D REALIZE THESE ENVIRONMENTS AND PLACES ARE PRICELESS.AND THAT WE DON'T REALLY NEED TO TAKE SO MUCH AND PROFIT TO REALLY BE FULLFILLED , HAPPY AND HEALTHY..IT IS ALLREADY THERE IN WHAT THE CREATOR HAS GIVEN US.......

PLEASE LEAVE JEKKYLL ISLAND ALONE..JUST LEAVE TO THE WORLDS CURRENT GENERATIONS AND THOSE TO COME.......SOME OF THE BEAUTY THE WAY NATURE CREATED IT TO BE.....I KNOW MY CHILDREN AND YOURS WOULD APPRECIATE AND LOVE US FOR BEING GOOD STEWARDS OF THE NATURAL RESOURCES WE HAVE BEEN ENTRUSTED TO PASS ON TO THEM AND THEIR CHILDREN AFTER THEM!..............

BEN REID MCGOWAN, VILLA RICA, GA

As we crossed to bridge to Jekyll Island this past June I breathed a sigh of relief. It had been two years since we had been there last and I had the worst dread that things would have changed. But it hadn’t! What we love to call “Our Island” was the same that we left two years ago. Not too long into our visit did we learn that this may not be true on our next visit.

Articles in the newspaper, posters, and a survey gave us information to say that our next visit may never be able to happen. It is so hard to find places as special as Jekyll. We travel all over the country, usually not to return to the same place twice because we feel there is so much to see. But Jekyll Island is different to us. It is the one place we plant to return to over and over. We also have told many others about this special place.

A little background that relates so well to the “affordability” issue: We are avid campers. We have been west, east and south, and we were looking for a campground on the coast. I requested south so the water would be warm. And we found Jekyll Island. After doing our research we realized that we found the beach, but not right at the campground, so we started looking for hotels. We were pleasantly surprised to find many places in our price range. We stayed at the Days Inn and had an unforgettable week in the summer of 2005. We knew we wanted to return.

We had already planned our trip for the summer of 2006, but our thoughts kept returning to Jekyll. My husband started counting the days in January for our trip this year. The prices had gone up at the Days Inn, but we still could afford it. We did look into alternatives for a trip next year, such as renting a house, because of the costs from this year’s trip. But we know we want to return to Jekyll. How much longer this will be possible is a worry to us.

We worry so much about development of Jekyll. We worry that this wonderful place will no longer be in our price range in a few years. It was a place that we went and were with families that lived like us. We love to say to friends, “this place is no Hilton Head”. It is an island get-away for the average family. We ride bikes, visit the Turtle Center, Golf, shop, eat, and enjoy the beautiful, uncrowded beaches every day.

It is difficult to be an outsider on this issue, because we don’t feel like outsiders.

We know the affordability issue is a state issue, but it is also an issue for all who are concerned about preserving what is indeed a rare phenomenon these days - a barrier island set aside for the benefit of everyday citizens.

Jekyll is surly a natural wonder, a scenic treasure, but it’s not just the serene nature of the island that draws us to its shores. We also love it because we can afford a week’s vacation there without having to say “no” to our children when they want to do something there. It is because we can afford the island that we are able to return.

Please consider our opinions on this issue. We are quite sure they are shared by many of Jekyll’s visitors who, like us, do not want to see this wonderful island become just another upscale resort.

Michael and Teri Hehn, Chicago, Il

Please preserve Jekyll Island as natural habitat for birds and other wildlife and as an affordable vacation spot for all Americans as it currently is. If current outdated buildings were replaced with condos that would accommodate growth but not interfere with the island's current functions. Thank you for taking my desires into consideration.

Myra Hundley, Putney, GA 31782

Jekyll has gone up in prices yes, but I have visited there since I was a child, I love the fact that it is affordable to most all families to carry their children and grandchildren. I am willing to pay a fair price I just want the quite restful Beach I have had most of my life at Jekyll. - Anonymous

I have been visiting Jekyll every since the bridge was built to connect it to the mainland. We carried our daughter there as a child.

Jekyll is a valuable spot for ALL Georgians. It should remain affordable for the average Georgian to enjoy. Most important though, is that the area not become over populated. It is important that the area remain as spot where all animal life, turtles, birds, etc. and plant life can flourish and provide opportunities for ALL people to enjoy them.

St. Simons and Sea Island provide spots for those who have plenty of money and want luxury. Don't let Jekyll become like those islands. Improve the motels, provide a few new reasonably sized motels if necessary, but don't build luxury hotels for the elderly and rich. ( I am 70 and can afford what I want to enjoy) I believe keeping Jekyll affordable and the population reasonable is crucial for ALL the people in Georgia and this region.

Barbara Wommack

I have visited Jekyll yearly since the early '80's. Now that I am retired and on a fixed income, it has become even more precious to me, due to it's unique beauty, and the fact that I can afford to visit for days at a time and fully savor it's delights. I am quite certain that I could not visit regularly if the rate was $250 per night, or even $150 per night.

While reading the JIA proposal which noted a recent decline in visitors, I was struck by the fact that I did not see mentioned that two of its major, large, hotels have not been functioning for several years (because they were demolished in anticipation of new hotels being built on their sites); therefore it is only logical that the number of visitors has declined during those years. There have simply been fewer places available for visitors to stay. The fact that such a statement could be made in the proposal without further explanation seems to indicate a disquieting subtext to all of this talk about "improvements" "capturing visitors" and "revenue generation" which seem to figure as paramount considerations to the current JIA.

One can only hope and pray that Georgia's tradition of enlightened public leadership in the care of it's coastal assets is not mutating into some sort of desperate free-for-all feeding frenzy by developers and their lobbyists to pander to the moneyed interests at the expense of all of the rest of us--and gobble up all the glorious land and beachfront that has been so wonderfully preserved. Jekyll does not need huge mega resort/condo/shopping center development. There is plenty of that already right next door at St. Simons and all along the Atlantic (and Pacific) coasts. Jekyll needs enlightened and far-sighted leaders to recognize its uniqueness and to protect it intact for all the generations to come.

Which other states possess such a wondrous, undeveloped jewel? What other state leadership has proven itself to be such enlightened guardians of its barrier island? We have bragging rights that few other entities in the world have. Georgia has been lucky in having generations of caring and decent leaders who recognized the unique value of Jekyll. People from all over the country and Canada who seek beauty and serenity come to Jekyll. They come not for glitzy and faux "attractions", but for the peace and tranquility that in itself is a transcendent value and "attraction;" sublime and superior in all ways to practically anything else available to working-class people.

Joan Lardin , Atlanta

"Affordability" should be defined for Jekyll in terms of Georgia's general public because Jekyll belongs to the state, whose duty is to serve all of its citizens.

The average citizen of Georgia probably cannot afford vacation accommodations for more than around $100 a night. Therefore while it is alright to have some upscale rooms on Jekyll (and there already are), it necessary also to have a large proportion of rooms affordable for the large portion of the Georgia populace.

Lew Gulick

Jekyll Island is a place where I can remember growing up, my parents took me there almost every summer, as it wasn't too far from our hometown, and it had the beach. Now that I'm a mom, I'd like to be able to take my kids to Jekyll to enjoy the beach, but with the way the prices of the rooms on the island are going, that won't be a possibility for much longer. Please, don't make this an "A Club" place, as people like myself would still like a place to enjoy the beach with family.

My wife & I have been staying on Jekyll Island for the month of March for the past 8 years and intend to do so as long as we can afford it. We find the reasonable cost at the Quality Inn and Suites to be within our budget and the accommodations satisfactory. We also make use of the golf facilities on a regular basis. The character of Jekyll with its abundant natural areas, bike trials, affordable restaurants, low traffic, historic and cultural activities are just what we like. We fear that further development will both erode this character and push Jekyll out of reach of our budgets as retirees. It should be noted that while we are not residents of Jekyll we typically spend approximately $5000 on Jekyll and in Glynn County during our stay. If we had to spend twice what we now spend just for housing, we might not go there at all. While we enjoy some of the facilities on St. Simons during our stay, it is not the type of place we would like to see Jekyll Island become.

L. Patrick & Judith A. Caveney, Ithaca, NY 14850

Jekyll Island remaining affordable for the majority of people is important. The affordability confers an added benefit. The price does not exclude people in the blatant way that Hilton Head and other destination Islands shut most people out. The openness ensures a certain honesty and "realness" that is not present in the "hoity toity" islands.

The "65% undeveloped" rule allows the natural areas and the wildlife to be part of this wonderful place.

I am concerned as well as my husband the affordability of jekyll island where it looks like the hotels are starting to go up because of condos going up. We stayed at days inn and even though there were some kids there for a prom our visit was overall nice. Now we are hearing that developers are trying again to ruin jekyll island. Please hotels, don't raise your rates! My husband and I are low income and we can't afford a lot of places on the beach! The Days Inn raised your rates from $91.50 to $100 for next May! We were thinking of possibly coming back, but we can't afford it you keep on raising your rates.

Leslie Marsh

Since 1977, when I first came to the island to golf, I have fallen in love with the place JUST AS IT IS! No McDonalds, No Pizza Huts, No Roller Coasters, No Shopping Malls, etc..etc..etc. Just a VERY LAYED BACK place to visit for a week - 10 days [I wish "WE" could afford longer!]. My wife and I are NOT related to the Roosevelt's or Hemmingway's, but we get by [70-90 K per year]. First the WANDERER INN ...COMFORT INN ...COMFORT SUITES, each year we rent two rooms for our family of four and her sister's family of four. ALL we need is in the photo (a photo of a Jekyll sunrise which could not be reproduced here - DE) I have inserted. WE NEED NOTHING MORE. To wake up and see THIS adds 5 years to our lives each time we visit. I could eat peanut butter and jelly sandwiches for a week if I had to, JUST to see THIS every morning.

I am ALL for improvement. We ALL NEED improvement. But this will NEVER be a HILTON HEAD - MIAMI BEACH, no matter WHAT YOU BUILD! People who travel to HILTON HEAD - MIAMI BEACH want 20 DOLLAR DRINKS & CAVIAR NOT TURTLE WALKS & ZACH'S EATS & TREATS! If this island is built up like THOSE BEACHES are, you BETTER sell ALL THE HOMES on the island to put in places for those "RICH FOLK" to go. THOSE people DO NOT just enjoy setting and DOING NOTHING! You WON'T SEE those people play PUTT PUTT and get eaten by the BUGS! THOSE people WON'T BE SEEN riding bikes in THAT LOVELY HEAT at 2 in the afternoon.

I HOPE TO GOD that this island is left AS IS as far as WE are concerned. I "THINK" there IS room on this island to satisfy BOTH PARTIES SOMEWHAT....BUT...WE MUST BE CAREFUL in doing so. I believe that for a ROOM such as we get each year at the COMFORT SUITES...as in 2 beds...roll